Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 01:00
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 122
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 736
71% 587 Pts
64-Core 933
58% 933 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 89 69 54 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 967
Write 155
Mixed 188
SusWrite 72.1
74% 346 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 92.6
4K Mixed 36.6
147% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 151
123% 177 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
79GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 71 70 71 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 117
Write 109
Mixed 61.1
SusWrite 70.3
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 23
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 24.9
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback