Biostar H410MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar H410MH  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 18:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 533
52% 429 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 50
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 71.1
41% 60.1 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 43.3
42% 53.2 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL1QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 147 145 148 138 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 973
Write 223
Mixed 343
SusWrite 146
92% 422 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 93.8
4K Mixed 38.7
151% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 215
162% 218 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 104%
Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
60GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 74 77 103 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 115
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 93.5
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 23.4
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 21.5
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback