Biostar H410MH

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	91.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H410MH (all builds)
Memory	11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '23 at 21:44
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$126 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 79 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 175 62% 108 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 506 51% 416 Pts	64-Core 683 42% 683 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.15021.11005 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	35.9% Below average	Lighting 42 Reflection 56.2 Parallax 66.9 34% 55 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 49.7 Splatting 41 39% 49 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: BL1QFXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 130 127 128 89 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Read 949 Write 181 Mixed 272 SusWrite 115 82% 379 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 34.9 124% 42.3 MB/s	DQ Read 237 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 204 148% 195 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 70GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 52 48 45 51 43 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 102 Write 110 Mixed 53.4 SusWrite 47.6 57% 78.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	77% Very good	MC Read 30.1 MC Write 31.1 MC Mixed 23.3 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 21.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	Latency 82.4 49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	304x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	293x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	142x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	72x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16