Biostar H410MH

Performance Results


Gaming 41% Speed boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 1 month ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H410MH (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 09 '23 at 22:09
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$126 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Memory 86.3 1-Core 122 2-Core 243 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 744 76% 612 Pts	64-Core 925 57% 925 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.8% Below average	Lighting 47 Reflection 60.8 Parallax 69.1 38% 59 fps	MRender 59 Gravity 55.5 Splatting 45.3 43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 18GB free (System drive) Firmware: BL1QFXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 128 125 125 121 103 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 926 Write 128 Mixed 240 SusWrite 123 76% 354 MB/s	4K Read 33.4 4K Write 85.1 4K Mixed 37.8 144% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 250 DQ Write 136 DQ Mixed 204 149% 197 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 70GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 69 70 71 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 70.2 68% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	83% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 32.9 MC Mixed 23.1 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 35.6 SC Mixed 25.5 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 998 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	304x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	293x
Core i3-10100Intel $94Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	107x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	142x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	72x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	68x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16