Biostar H410MH

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 1 month ago, 13 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Biostar H410MH (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200603
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '23 at 18:08
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400-$124 71,804 User benchmarks, average bench 84% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 89 2-Core 173 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 532 54% 438 Pts	64-Core 661 41% 661 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% ASRock(1849 5026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2200 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	41.3% Average	Lighting 49.2 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 70.4 40% 60.7 fps	MRender 59.7 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 47 44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HAJD-000L1 256GB 2,446 User benchmarks, average bench 119% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: BL1QFXV7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 150 138 136 149 137 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 950 Write 224 Mixed 340 SusWrite 145 90% 415 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 94.8 4K Mixed 39 152% 56 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 190 154% 218 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 177%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 60GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 78 78 106 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 116 Write 114 Mixed 60.3 SusWrite 94.9 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7EH55AA# 2x8GB 164 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 23.2 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 21.9 65% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410MH Builds (Compare 1,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H410MH

CPU
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	307x
Core i5-10400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	293x
Core i3-10100Intel $90Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	108x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	143x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 37,718 samples	72x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	70x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	28x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	24x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	21x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369