Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics156% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '24 at 16:55
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 80.4
1-Core 163
2-Core 315
99% 186 Pts
4-Core 625
8-Core 979
99% 802 Pts
64-Core 1,163
72% 1,163 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Lighting 233
Reflection 212
Parallax 202
190% 216 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 151
Splatting 135
132% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 156%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1947 2017 1979 2149 2142 2135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,476
Write 2,273
Mixed 2,052
SusWrite 2,061
499% 2,216 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 78.2
284% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,459
DQ Write 1,156
DQ Mixed 1,393
1,019% 1336 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 370%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 485 487 487 477 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 481
Mixed 388
SusWrite 474
104% 464 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 53.6
190% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 278
229% 329 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 124%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
685GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 101 106 102 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 112
Write 119
Mixed 59
SusWrite 104
72% 98.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
420GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 150 143 144 142 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 148
Mixed 105
SusWrite 148
103% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
72.8% Very good
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 25.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 360 24.5" 1280 720 DEL42BC DELL AW2523HF
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback