Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics159% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive348% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '24 at 19:03
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Memory 77.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 288
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 899
92% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 4125 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Lighting 236
Reflection 213
Parallax 206
192% 218 fps
MRender 222
Gravity 158
Splatting 140
138% 174 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 159%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1868 1930 1800 2122 2137 2138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
348% Outstanding
Read 2,155
Write 2,283
Mixed 1,824
SusWrite 1,999
466% 2,065 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 71.1
269% 98 MB/s
DQ Read 1,476
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 1,267
957% 1,291 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 348%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 483 484 483 436 478 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 329
Mixed 397
SusWrite 467
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 49.5
180% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 277
228% 328 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
730GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 104 103 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 103
71% 97.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
420GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 148 143 145 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 136
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 150
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 25.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 360 24.5" 1920 1009 DEL42BC DELL AW2523HF
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback