Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '24 at 00:43
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
87% Excellent
Memory 71.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 295
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 813
85% 682 Pts
64-Core 970
60% 970 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3850 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 200
Parallax 193
179% 204 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 147
Splatting 131
129% 163 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1596 1656 1701 1826 1825 1692 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,186
Write 1,908
Mixed 1,553
SusWrite 1,716
414% 1,841 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 65.9
228% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,352
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 1,263
914% 1,190 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 314%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 451 453 480 478 461 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 407
Write 432
Mixed 331
SusWrite 461
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 43.6
170% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 277
229% 328 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 112%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
730GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 99 105 103 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 102
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 102
66% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
420GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 154 147 144 146 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 149
Write 118
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 152
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65.4% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 25.4
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 25.8
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 360 24.5" 1920 1009 DEL42BC DELL AW2523HF
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback