Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics155% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 19:25
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$245
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 161
2-Core 304
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 613
8-Core 945
96% 779 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 4025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Lighting 231
Reflection 210
Parallax 203
188% 215 fps
MRender 211
Gravity 150
Splatting 134
131% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 155%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1914 1983 2038 2170 2173 2161 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,509
Write 2,289
Mixed 2,068
SusWrite 2,073
503% 2,235 MB/s
4K Read 61.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 77
282% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,506
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,357
1,004% 1,332 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 372%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 480 488 478 487 488 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 491
Mixed 406
SusWrite 481
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.6
186% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 281
231% 331 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 123%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
678GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 101 105 103 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 108
Write 114
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 103
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
411GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 143 143 141 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 145
Write 138
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 142
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 29.2
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 29.7
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 360 24.5" 1920 1009 DEL42BC DELL AW2523HF
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback