Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 19 '24 at 19:16
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 154
2-Core 286
94% 173 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 904
90% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,079
67% 1,079 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
EVGA(3842 4455) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.76
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 162
Parallax 140
100% 142 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 110
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1851 1950 1952 2077 2145 2058 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
361% Outstanding
Read 2,408
Write 2259
Mixed 2,037
SusWrite 2,006
490% 2,178 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 74
273% 99.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1,166
DQ Mixed 1,306
982% 1,318 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 361%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS100T2B0A 1TB
367GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 483 484 487 479 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 462
Mixed 352
SusWrite 483
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 52.6
176% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 252
216% 319 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 120%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
685GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 102 105 102 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 107
Write 109
Mixed 59.4
SusWrite 104
69% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
420GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 148 143 144 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 152
Mixed 103
SusWrite 148
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
73.5% Very good
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 29
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 26.8
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 360 24.5" 1920 1009 DEL42BC DELL AW2523HF
Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,029 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback