Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory43.9 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 19 '23 at 11:37
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 79.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 794
80% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3565 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 100
Parallax 90.5
78% 95.4 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 79.7
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 670 676 1495 669 681 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 280
Write 895
Mixed 224
SusWrite 827
127% 557 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 7.8
98% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 474
401% 584 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 117%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
357GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 799 673 670 710 673 676 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 930
Mixed 225
SusWrite 700
117% 509 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 7.7
95% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 478
405% 591 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 105%
Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
387GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 426 421 384 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 426
Mixed 355
SusWrite 307
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 40.3
149% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 166
127% 172 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
154GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2177 814 557 559 551 550 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,333
Write 757
Mixed 1,459
SusWrite 868
248% 1,104 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 76.1
256% 97.1 MB/s
DQ Read 638
DQ Write 953
DQ Mixed 1,008
703% 866 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 221%
Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 145 141 141 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 82
Write 131
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 142
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
93% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
931GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 206 212 206 207 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 108
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 207
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 22.7
68% 23.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback