Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory43.6 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 06 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 133
2-Core 246
84% 153 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 774
74% 610 Pts
64-Core 963
60% 963 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 3565 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Lighting 95
Reflection 98.8
Parallax 89.2
77% 94.3 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 83.9
Splatting 79.4
74% 92 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
654GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2046 669 693 850 733 690 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 1950
Write 2,585
Mixed 2,081
SusWrite 947
426% 1,891 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 82.6
282% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,146
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 932
694% 931 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 265%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
423GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1203 677 682 555 373 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1,904
Write 2,417
Mixed 2,022
SusWrite 644
393% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 81.9
282% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,185
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 987
739% 993 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 247%
Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
780GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 421 427 441 442 440 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 324
Write 115
Mixed 235
SusWrite 432
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 39.9
145% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 149
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 158
122% 164 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
184GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2223 555 531 561 565 568 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,380
Write 1,987
Mixed 1,465
SusWrite 834
320% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 75.9
256% 95.5 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 821
DQ Mixed 960
646% 769 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 216%
Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 143 145 141 144 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 93.7
Write 124
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 142
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 167 167 165 166 167 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 135
Write 117
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 165
80% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.2
393% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 22.5
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 25
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback