Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory43.5 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 08:38
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 81.7
1-Core 136
2-Core 262
88% 160 Pts
4-Core 500
8-Core 788
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 986
61% 986 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3558 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Lighting 97.2
Reflection 100
Parallax 90.1
79% 95.8 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 85.1
Splatting 78.9
74% 92.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1183 190 81 166 954 675 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,917
Write 2,527
Mixed 2,083
SusWrite 542
398% 1,767 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 82.5
283% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,084
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 894
667% 894 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 237%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
357GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 372 381 370 592 680 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 176
Write 1,632
Mixed 232
SusWrite 461
144% 625 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 7.3
91% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 669
DQ Write 564
DQ Mixed 461
388% 565 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 88%
Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
894GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 415 423 441 439 439 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 346
Write 118
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 428
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 12.6
56% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 16.2
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 16.7
13% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
154GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2230 793 557 559 549 551 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 1,706
Mixed 1,444
SusWrite 873
302% 1,339 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 74.3
250% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 593
DQ Write 848
DQ Mixed 965
661% 802 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 216%
Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 146 141 142 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 77.9
Write 110
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 142
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 167 166 167 168 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 122
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 167
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.1
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 38
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback