Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive325% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory44.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 13:44
Run Duration318 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 247
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 790
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,004
62% 1,004 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3554 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Lighting 96.6
Reflection 100
Parallax 90.5
79% 95.8 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 79.6
74% 92.6 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2376 2426 2432 2532 906 622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
325% Outstanding
Read 2,021
Write 2,570
Mixed 2,120
SusWrite 1,882
486% 2,148 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 83.8
287% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,114
DQ Write 702
DQ Mixed 931
688% 915 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 325%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
427GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1063 674 682 725 671 694 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,919
Write 2,451
Mixed 2,042
SusWrite 751
404% 1,791 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 83.2
284% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,194
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 985
738% 993 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 255%
Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
894GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 431 429 438 146 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 412
Mixed 356
SusWrite 331
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 41.4
153% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 162
126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
200GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2227 836 557 548 555 534 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,336
Write 794
Mixed 1,492
SusWrite 876
253% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 77.3
258% 96.8 MB/s
DQ Read 761
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 981
692% 869 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 223%
Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 145 144 140 142 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 105
Write 111
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 142
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 168 167 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 143
Write 149
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 164
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
384% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 22.5
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 24.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback