Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive356% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory44.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 14 '23 at 12:17
Run Duration302 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 36%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 78.2
1-Core 131
2-Core 256
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 755
75% 611 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3554 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Lighting 96.8
Reflection 100
Parallax 89.9
79% 95.6 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 84.8
Splatting 80.1
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2365 2395 2395 2533 2528 2530 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
356% Outstanding
Read 1,964
Write 2,586
Mixed 2,070
SusWrite 2,458
514% 2,269 MB/s
4K Read 56.1
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 80.8
278% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,142
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 914
682% 916 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 356%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
427GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,898
Write 2,431
Mixed 1,870
464% 2,066 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 82.7
284% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 969
726% 976 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
894GB free
Firmware: CS900612
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 414
Mixed 347
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 40.7
151% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 166
128% 173 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
200GB free
Firmware: CS303226
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,428
Write 1,588
Mixed 1,484
336% 1,500 MB/s
4K Read 48
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 77.5
260% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 978
674% 826 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 111
Mixed 67.3
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
47% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 148
Mixed 28.3
83% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 112%
EPSON Storage 32GB
30GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 7.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 7.4
8% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.8% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 22.9
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 24
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 84
48% 84 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback