Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory43.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221226
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateAug 29 '23 at 10:28
Run Duration378 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 80.5
1-Core 136
2-Core 256
87% 157 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 774
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Gigabyte(1458 407D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2325 MHz, MLim: 3554 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 100
Parallax 90.7
80% 96.4 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 85.3
Splatting 79.6
74% 92.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
707GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2311 2384 834 674 678 920 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 2,070
Write 2,559
Mixed 2,097
SusWrite 1,300
453% 2,007 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 3.6
181% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 280
224% 313 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 226%
Great: 394%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
423GB free
Firmware: P9CR30A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 732 677 663 706 686 686 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1898
Write 2,394
Mixed 2019
SusWrite 692
394% 1,751 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 82.2
283% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,187
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 410
462% 796 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 250%
Great: 394%
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
780GB free
Firmware: CS900612
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 417 423 420 437 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 200
Write 105
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 424
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 11.9
54% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 14.8
11% 14.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 104%
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
184GB free
Firmware: CS303226
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1715 561 553 550 554 543 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,372
Write 2242
Mixed 1,460
SusWrite 746
329% 1,455 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 76.8
257% 96.4 MB/s
DQ Read 709
DQ Write 868
DQ Mixed 1,000
695% 859 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 216%
Great: 266%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2017)-$74
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 143 149 144 146 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
67% Good
Read 90.5
Write 122
Mixed 65.9
SusWrite 143
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67%
Great: 85%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
425GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 167 167 165 166 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 142
Mixed 29
SusWrite 165
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.1
382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK32GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 48GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 36.2
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 35.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 48.8" 1280 720 LHCFFFF MD49DQHD-2
Typical GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 737 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570S AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,341
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback