Asus H110M-C/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190724
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '23 at 16:55
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$92 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 196 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 369 48% 360 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	44.5% Average	Lighting 53.5 Reflection 93.8 Parallax 57.2 44% 68.2 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 56.4 Splatting 50.2 46% 57.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 54%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 107GB free (System drive) Firmware: V1.2.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 470 Write 451 Mixed 400 98% 440 MB/s	4K Read 37.6 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 42.2 152% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 241 175% 221 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 240%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 919GB free Firmware: CC45 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 154 Write 131 Mixed 85.3 92% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 35.8 Write 5 Mixed 6.7 14% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.9 155% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avant W641GU48J7240ND Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	80.1% Excellent	MC Read 29 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 25.2 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 21.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	208	59	144	24"	1920 1017	BNQ7F31 ZOWIE XL LCD

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-C/BR Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H110M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	128x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	74x
Core i5-6400Intel $77Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	51x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	57x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	41x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	22x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16