Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 23:35
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 346
44% 333 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.4% Very good
Lighting 90.3
Reflection 115
Parallax 74.7
74% 93.5 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 71.8
70% 87.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 21 20 18 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 91%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62
27GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 172 139 133 130 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 446
Mixed 429
SusWrite 140
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 51.6
166% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 130%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
257GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 12 13 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4B.8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 28.8
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.1
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $494
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback