MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive305% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 09:55
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$170
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 83.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 353
108% 205 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,002
103% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,528
95% 1,528 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3775 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
96.3% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 117
Parallax 121
102% 121 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 104
Splatting 85.7
86% 108 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 1084 793 794 792 794 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 2,434
Write 1,483
Mixed 1,525
SusWrite 904
353% 1,587 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 93
308% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1125
DQ Mixed 1,230
931% 1,255 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 305%
Great: 346%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$61
465GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 469 470 472 425 348 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 467
Mixed 445
SusWrite 442
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 63.6
214% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 130%
Great: 130%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
2TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2893 3141 3042 2980 3002 3112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
452% Outstanding
Read 2,651
Write 3,212
Mixed 2929
SusWrite 3,028
669% 2,955 MB/s
4K Read 73.1
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 101
336% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1154
DQ Mixed 1239
936% 1,258 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 452%
Great: 508%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 201 200 201 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 189
Mixed 83
SusWrite 200
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
391% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP16G4DFRA32A.M8FF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 32.1
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 34.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 180 23.8" 1280 720 HGC2400 CR240HD
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,666 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $881
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback