MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B47
MotherboardMSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)  (all builds)
Memory18.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170912
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 06 '24 at 16:40
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 57.9
2-Core 74.9
47% 69.6 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 191
20% 159 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 86.9
Parallax 82.2
75% 86.9 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 78.5
Splatting 70.5
70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 331 324 320 341 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 442
Write 317
Mixed 274
SusWrite 326
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 20.9
77% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 173
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 156
118% 159 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
119GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 884 963 940 933 936 658 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 1,411
Mixed 1,309
SusWrite 886
243% 1,063 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 34.6
4K Mixed 31.1
102% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 99.2
90% 138 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 119%
Great: 429%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
247GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 69 65 27 64 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 81.1
Write 79.1
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 59.5
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
154% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
303GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 53 61 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 76.8
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 58.6
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 57%
Seagate ST4000VN006-3CW104 4TB
146GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 85 96 96 104 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 85.3
Write 91.1
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 94.9
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 109%
BUFFALO HD-PNTU3 1TB
804GB free, PID 01e7
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 86 82 85 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 88.6
Write 89.2
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 85
106% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$95
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.1% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 19.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 12.6
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 90.7
44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0P 0R 1G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 28% 29 210 58 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47) Builds (Compare 2,269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $501
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback