HP 870-224

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	HP 870-224 (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 82F1
Memory	17.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1216 x 684 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	31.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '22 at 06:13
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	93%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$182 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Memory 59.4 1-Core 57.8 2-Core 75.8 42% 64.3 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 173 21% 160 Pts	64-Core 151 9% 151 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.9% Average	Lighting 57.6 Reflection 62.1 Parallax 54 47% 57.9 fps	MRender 59.9 Gravity 58.3 Splatting 54.5 47% 57.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 157GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 69 72 113 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 123 Write 102 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 79.7 70% 94.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	51.8% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 15.2 53% 18.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 19.7 SC Mixed 18.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 32: 3R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	48%	29	175	14	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27C3 MX279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870-224 Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

System: HP 870-224

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $182Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	446x
Core i7-7700Intel $317Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	22x
Core i7-7700KIntel $370Bench 84%, 634,862 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	350x
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
RTX 2060Nvidia $225Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	22x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
MX500 1TBCrucial $52Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	14x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 7,235 samples	108x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsair $50Bench 76%, 105,447 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $320	Nvidia RTX 3060 $350	Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-12400F $150	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $419	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12600K $194	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $800	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16