Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds)
Memory	8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '23 at 00:42
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	37%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$92 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 89.8 2-Core 176 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 310 40% 304 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.58 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (46 fps cap detected)	36% Below average	Lighting 45.2 Reflection 45.7 Parallax 0.2 37% 30.4 fps	MRender 47.2 Gravity 45.2 Splatting 36.4 34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 121 54 95 45 114 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 443 Write 372 Mixed 310 SusWrite 114 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 17.4 60% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 0.6 71% 169 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$45 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 132GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 162 163 175 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	94.7% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 179 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 165 99% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 94.7% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Avant W641GU48J7240ND Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.7% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 17.1 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 16.7 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 85.7 47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	22	60	28.8"	1280 720	GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $92Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	253x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	99x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
9905678-102.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 1,046 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $237

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16