Asus H61M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1280 x 720 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 11:33
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$35
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 165
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 271
34% 261 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 68.8
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 66.8
56% 68.9 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 63
Splatting 55.3
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA348-6007000 480GB
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0311A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 195 218 231 232 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.6% Good
Read 256
Write 215
Mixed 221
SusWrite 207
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 53.7
4K Mixed 23.6
96% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 41.5
73% 142 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 859B RM25664BA1339.8FMR 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.9
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-K Builds (Compare 2,356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-K - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $199Nvidia RTX 4070 $499WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $350Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback