Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 224%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 09:08
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,182
104% 885 Pts
64-Core 2,708
168% 2,708 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 259
Reflection 383
Parallax 272
211% 304 fps
MRender 371
Gravity 266
Splatting 196
218% 277 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 191%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1185 481 475 519 637 944 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 1405
Mixed 330
SusWrite 707
254% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 80.3
260% 93.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,208
DQ Write 913
DQ Mixed 510
531% 877 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 258%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 835 837 837 837 836 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 1,888
Write 2114
Mixed 1,435
SusWrite 882
355% 1,580 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 57.5
206% 75.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,275
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 1,098
830% 1,120 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 243%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 415 436 462 461 460 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 460
Mixed 339
SusWrite 439
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 40.2
137% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 126
121% 192 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
122GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 49 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 416
Write 49.7
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 48.9
32% 149 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 15.5
76% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 49.7
DQ Mixed 23.5
33% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 83.3
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 42.6
156% 54.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 38.8
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 142%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback