Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 195%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 00:10
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$369
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 74.8
1-Core 181
2-Core 357
106% 204 Pts
4-Core 706
8-Core 1,387
124% 1,047 Pts
64-Core 2771
172% 2771 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 258
Reflection 384
Parallax 273
210% 305 fps
MRender 371
Gravity 266
Splatting 197
218% 278 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 191%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 923 881 737 595 914 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,470
Write 2,074
Mixed 225
SusWrite 805
308% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 87.1
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1322
DQ Write 1,058
DQ Mixed 515
569% 965 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 291%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 823 839 835 838 838 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,804
Write 1,556
Mixed 1,679
SusWrite 890
333% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 72.5
255% 96.7 MB/s
DQ Read 665
DQ Write 1,135
DQ Mixed 1,246
847% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 245%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 436 462 380 369 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 399
Write 450
Mixed 253
SusWrite 408
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 27.1
104% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 99.9
99% 158 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
125GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 262 260 266 265 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 435
Write 253
Mixed 256
SusWrite 256
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 85.3
4K Mixed 14.6
97% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 23.4
41% 80.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 77.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 29.3
128% 44.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 26.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 115%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,018
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback