Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 234%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 06:11
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 170
2-Core 357
104% 200 Pts
4-Core 697
8-Core 1,365
122% 1,031 Pts
64-Core 2,800
173% 2,800 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 256
Reflection 379
Parallax 269
209% 301 fps
MRender 363
Gravity 260
Splatting 189
212% 271 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 188%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 976 917 638 934 880 503 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,539
Write 2,134
Mixed 237
SusWrite 808
316% 1,430 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 79.2
267% 94.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,322
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 513
564% 956 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 286%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 826 837 842 845 838 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1939
Write 1,785
Mixed 1,694
SusWrite 889
354% 1,577 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 69.2
245% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,468
DQ Write 1095
DQ Mixed 1,248
942% 1,271 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 264%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 436 452 454 452 454 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 402
Write 458
Mixed 251
SusWrite 445
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 31.2
118% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 103
101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
125GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 257 262 264 262 260 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 409
Write 262
Mixed 248
SusWrite 255
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 83.9
4K Mixed 15.4
98% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 23.2
41% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 72.5
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 28.6
122% 42.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 27.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback