Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 238%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics192% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 20:36
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 75.5
1-Core 177
2-Core 356
106% 203 Pts
4-Core 704
8-Core 1,369
123% 1,037 Pts
64-Core 2,766
171% 2,766 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
192% Outstanding
Lighting 260
Reflection 384
Parallax 274
212% 306 fps
MRender 371
Gravity 268
Splatting 197
219% 279 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 192%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1351 821 705 646 908 459 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,016
Write 1,482
Mixed 330
SusWrite 815
257% 1,161 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 78.4
266% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 1315
DQ Write 1,053
DQ Mixed 578
598% 982 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 266%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1181 836 840 843 843 840 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,652
Write 1,528
Mixed 1530
SusWrite 897
315% 1,402 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 66.8
236% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,444
DQ Write 1,119
DQ Mixed 1,208
924% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 251%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 402 444 460 463 402 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 392
Write 429
Mixed 305
SusWrite 435
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 31.1
122% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 105
101% 159 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
125GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 245 259 263 262 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 425
Write 241
Mixed 259
SusWrite 257
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 15.6
99% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 22.8
62% 130 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 56.3
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 29.6
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 27.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback