Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 199%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 242%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive210% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$354
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 179
2-Core 352
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 704
8-Core 1,380
123% 1,042 Pts
64-Core 2,746
170% 2,746 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
195% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 383
Parallax 282
217% 310 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 272
Splatting 197
221% 282 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 195%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 452 993 494 751 740 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
210% Outstanding
Read 1,905
Write 1,765
Mixed 826
SusWrite 751
292% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 44.8
176% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 1,010
DQ Mixed 510
463% 689 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 210%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 826 837 837 839 831 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,918
Write 2,054
Mixed 1,635
SusWrite 892
365% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 46
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 69.4
245% 93.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,450
DQ Write 1111
DQ Mixed 1,230
934% 1,264 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 264%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 397 447 461 462 464 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 384
Write 387
Mixed 254
SusWrite 432
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 22.5
80% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 99.9
99% 157 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
138GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 240 257 263 267 263 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 411
Write 258
Mixed 256
SusWrite 253
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 15.9
98% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 24.1
42% 81.6 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 73.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 28.7
123% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 90.4
44% 90.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback