Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 203%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 246%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics197% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 01:06
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 77.2
1-Core 180
2-Core 357
107% 205 Pts
4-Core 706
8-Core 1,344
122% 1,025 Pts
64-Core 2,766
171% 2,766 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$866
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
197% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 394
Parallax 282
220% 316 fps
MRender 380
Gravity 274
Splatting 199
223% 284 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 197%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
289GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42AZS6AC Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1047 593 697 910 910 638 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 1,796
Mixed 247
SusWrite 799
289% 1,312 MB/s
4K Read 64.1
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 86.6
299% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,319
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 514
569% 965 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 291%
Great: 372%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$75
343GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 835 838 837 839 842 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 1,783
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,705
SusWrite 890
334% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 68.8
252% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 1,459
DQ Write 1,132
DQ Mixed 1,246
946% 1,279 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 260%
Great: 297%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
137GB free
Firmware: DXM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 400 446 466 466 452 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 434
Mixed 267
SusWrite 434
86% 380 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 89.1
4K Mixed 30.9
134% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 101
100% 158 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 108%
Mtfddak2 56MAM-1K1 256GB
138GB free
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 248 261 267 267 251 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 395
Write 220
Mixed 258
SusWrite 254
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 14.1
98% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 23.3
41% 81.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 70.5
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 29.4
122% 42.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 28
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 110%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,881 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,023
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback