Asrock Z390 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive230% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 09:38
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 977
91% 756 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.9
Reflection 76.6
Parallax 69.1
57% 71.9 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 69
55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
284GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 650 648 642 554 526 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Read 2,254
Write 1,985
Mixed 1,311
SusWrite 652
346% 1,550 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 49.2
158% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 1,124
850% 1,144 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 230%
Great: 340%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
350GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 1668 1743 1741 1741 1735 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,137
Write 1,753
Mixed 895
SusWrite 1,714
364% 1,625 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 45.3
145% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 1,151
DQ Mixed 1,104
858% 1,175 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 289%
Great: 353%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNTD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 123 123 126 125 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 161
Write 159
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 123
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
232% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 114 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 104
Write 118
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 117
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUH728060ALE604 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: A4GNW55F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 159 154 163 165 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 165
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 162
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
160% 2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 149 152 150 152 149 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 150
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$7
0GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.6
Write 21.6
Mixed 22.7
32% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
122% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3733 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 42.4
MC Mixed 33
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 26.3
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 105%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Taichi - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback