Asrock Z390 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateDec 11 '22 at 07:32
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 144
2-Core 286
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 1,016
96% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.6% Above average
Lighting 68.6
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 71.3
56% 73 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 71.2
58% 70.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 644 532 550 527 514 508 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,714
Write 1,066
Mixed 986
SusWrite 546
239% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 24.2
88% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 91.1
DQ Mixed 166
215% 415 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 153%
Great: 340%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
351GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 848 817 865 926 938 928 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,757
Write 994
Mixed 677
SusWrite 887
239% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 22.9
82% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,047
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 145
210% 422 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 174%
Great: 353%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNTD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 135 138 132 135 134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 162
Write 174
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 135
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.9
210% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 116 114 113 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 106
Write 117
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 113
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUH728060ALE604 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: A4GNW55F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 167 164 158 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 193
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 159
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 143 147 142 140 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 137
Write 148
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 142
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3733 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 29.7
SC Mixed 22.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Taichi - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,141
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback