Asrock Z390 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$264
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 93.5
1-Core 144
2-Core 254
92% 164 Pts
4-Core 573
8-Core 966
94% 769 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 69.9
58% 73 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 71
Splatting 69.1
57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 704 634 576 590 545 545 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
182% Outstanding
Read 2,202
Write 1311
Mixed 1,086
SusWrite 599
288% 1,300 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 29.9
4K Mixed 27.4
108% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 197
234% 434 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 182%
Great: 340%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
351GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1176 1101 1167 1200 1158 1159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 2,174
Write 1,144
Mixed 824
SusWrite 1,160
294% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 24.1
93% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,056
DQ Write 90.2
DQ Mixed 177
229% 441 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 211%
Great: 353%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: APGNTD05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 123 121 126 122 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 166
Write 166
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 123
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
199% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: JKAOA20N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 111 116 114 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 107
Write 122
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 115
72% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUH728060ALE604 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: A4GNW55F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 157 163 163 154 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 186
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 158
109% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 146 144 145 141 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 141
Write 149
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 144
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3733 C17 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Taichi Builds (Compare 1,134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 153%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 152%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Taichi - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,133
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback