Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 14:39
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 59%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 187
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 462
47% 380 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2143 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.4% Below average
Lighting 46.6
Reflection 87.6
Parallax 50.3
38% 61.5 fps
MRender 55.2
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 51.8
42% 51.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 706 701 753 749 714 784 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 864
Write 754
Mixed 565
SusWrite 734
164% 729 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 39
138% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 963
DQ Write 716
DQ Mixed 747
584% 809 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 353%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
856GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 116 116 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 101
Write 106
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 114
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSC.16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2448 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 8.7
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $953
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback