HP Engage Flex Pro-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Engage Flex Pro-C  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8476
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 12:11
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 211
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 569
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 8476) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 8.3
6% 8.23 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 0.3
4% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 388 398 393 395 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,420
Write 829
Mixed 885
SusWrite 525
203% 915 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 65.1
216% 76.9 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 1,039
DQ Mixed 777
635% 897 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 199%
Great: 239%
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB
128GB free
Firmware: 1L2QEXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 624 331 332 329 328 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,552
Write 1,245
Mixed 768
SusWrite 374
219% 985 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 69.5
234% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 1,041
DQ Mixed 1,028
768% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 202%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMUA5110ME78HAF-2666 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88% Excellent
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 25.2
90% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 36.4
SC Mixed 25.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Engage Flex Pro-C Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Engage Flex Pro-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback