Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Sail boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A10-9700E R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G 229 User benchmarks, average bench 41% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	29.6% Poor	Memory 34 1-Core 53.4 2-Core 100 35% 62.5 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 147 20% 147 Pts	64-Core 167 10% 167 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3130) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.09.04.02 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 6.8 Parallax 7.3 4% 6.33 fps	MRender 3.3 Gravity 5.8 Splatting 5 4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 8%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000L7 256GB 10,890 User benchmarks, average bench 182% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1L2QEXD7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 752 372 303 296 302 282 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 1,143 Write 1,145 Mixed 689 SusWrite 384 188% 840 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 21.7 81% 27.3 MB/s	DQ Read 339 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 242 186% 258 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 247%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB 16,227 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.4% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 7 MC Mixed 8.1 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 4.97 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM04FB SAMSUNG

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $67	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16