HP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8648
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime51.9 Days
Run DateMay 15 '23 at 17:45
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver J5040
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 42.3
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 124
42% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
HP(103C 8648) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 197 249 229 248 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 359
Write 293
Mixed 317
SusWrite 240
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 38.8
128% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 335
250% 333 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron_ 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 3.3
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Slim Desktop S01-aF1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback