HP ProDesk 600 G4 Mini PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G4 Mini PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83EF
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200427
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Memory 25.4
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 182
51% 102 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 384
41% 327 Pts
64-Core 500
31% 500 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 83EF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 6.4
6% 6.83 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 7
Splatting 10.3
8% 9.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.21%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 391 382 403 427 424 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 734
Write 595
Mixed 715
SusWrite 410
138% 613 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 31.6
111% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 516
DQ Write 388
DQ Mixed 426
326% 443 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 197%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.1% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 11.4
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 283
14% 283 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G4 Mini PC Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G4 Mini PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback