Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '22 at 02:28
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51% Above average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 65.8
2-Core 116
49% 81.6 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 479
40% 344 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 215GB
182GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 178 169 195 208 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 345
Write 211
Mixed 290
SusWrite 168
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 7
29% 7.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 55%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 125 120 124 125 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 78.3
Write 77.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 113
60% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 6.2
768% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 55%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 19
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 4.8
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback