Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 990 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 27
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 88.7
29% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 254
26% 212 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB
98GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 57 57 68 69 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.7% Very poor
Read 184
Write 105
Mixed 130
SusWrite 66.3
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3.2
14% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 58%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 58 57 54 63 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 174
Write 95.6
Mixed 144
SusWrite 59.7
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.4
623% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback