Amazon t3.xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 21:07
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.2% Above average
Memory 63.8
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 165
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 249
8-Core 241
33% 245 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB
97GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.4 8 7.1 6.3 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.4% Very poor
Read 157
Write 164
Mixed 141
SusWrite 7.4
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 7.9
36% 9.5 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 58%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.2 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.89% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 10.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 3.1
14% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 6.7
874% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.89%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback