Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon t3.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1364 x 716 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 18:58
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 44.4
1-Core 38.1
2-Core 79.7
32% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 254
27% 216 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB
99GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 68 67 67 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.5% Very poor
Read 179
Write 117
Mixed 155
SusWrite 65.5
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 2.9
11% 3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 58%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 41 42 41 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 150
Write 85
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 41.8
70% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.2
396% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.27 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback