ADD TO PC
BUILD

Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 23 months ago, 16 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Amazon t3.2xlarge (all builds)
Motherboard	Amazon
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171016
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 03 '21 at 14:51
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL 133 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 65.9 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 195 66% 119 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 514 54% 433 Pts	64-Core 509 32% 509 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 107GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 84GB free Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 55 22 48 135 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.4% Very poor	Read 166 Write 155 Mixed 139 SusWrite 67.2 30% 132 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 7.2 28% 7.83 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 58%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 92 70 28 61 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x31GB 864 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1 of 1 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 24.9 MC Mixed 20.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 4.9 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 241%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.

Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?

PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.

Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.

Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...

Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?

Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback