Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 127% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Apr 25 '21 at 13:57
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 151 2-Core 297 99% 181 Pts	4-Core 596 8-Core 1,075 100% 836 Pts	64-Core 1,563 97% 1,563 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 156 Parallax 156 130% 157 fps	MRender 190 Gravity 138 Splatting 121 119% 149 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 369GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 470 478 495 495 499 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	251% Outstanding	Read 2,547 Write 2,235 Mixed 1468 SusWrite 491 375% 1,685 MB/s	4K Read 62.7 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 79.2 262% 88.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,098 DQ Write 604 DQ Mixed 834 625% 845 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 251% Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 482 480 478 479 479 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 478 Mixed 391 SusWrite 479 104% 460 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 91.1 4K Mixed 53.4 176% 61.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 353 265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 134%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 7GB free Firmware: K3110310 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,246 Write 256 Mixed 429 139% 644 MB/s	4K Read 194 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 127 506% 138 MB/s	DQ Read 1,232 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 416 391% 638 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 907GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 482 481 478 479 480 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 512 Write 482 Mixed 395 SusWrite 479 105% 467 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 91.6 4K Mixed 45.4 157% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 201 202 203 199 201 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 163 Mixed 76.9 SusWrite 201 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 668GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 52 54 53 52 53 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 119GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 38.1 Write 38.1 Mixed 38 SusWrite 39.5 53% 38.4 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 14.6 4K Mixed 8.1 810% 10.9 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 8.3 855% 11.5 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB 4,599 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.9 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 31.2 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 47.7 SC Mixed 30.5 95% 33.2 GB/s	Latency 58.1 69% 58.1 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	278x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	249x
Core i7-8700KIntel $188Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	65x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	74x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $671

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48