Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 128% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 15:21
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 301 100% 182 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 1094 100% 840 Pts	64-Core 1,569 97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 154 Parallax 171 131% 162 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 136 Splatting 119 118% 148 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 846 841 849 851 852 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	243% Outstanding	Read 2,149 Write 2,099 Mixed 1,615 SusWrite 876 378% 1,685 MB/s	4K Read 62.5 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 69.2 229% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,119 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 436 398% 632 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 243% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 467 472 473 476 474 473 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 465 Write 442 Mixed 386 SusWrite 473 100% 441 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 49.8 164% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 352 263% 350 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 134%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 27GB free Firmware: K3110310 SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 268 268 263 257 258 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1234 Write 256 Mixed 422 SusWrite 264 118% 544 MB/s	4K Read 168 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 110 435% 117 MB/s	DQ Read 1,242 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 420 394% 642 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 328%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 907GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 472 473 476 474 473 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 470 Mixed 380 SusWrite 472 102% 455 MB/s	4K Read 32.2 4K Write 75 4K Mixed 42.6 143% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 351 263% 350 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 201 202 201 200 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 151 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 201 116% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 673GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 129 128 126 128 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 119GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 40 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	59.4% Above average	Read 38.1 Write 38.1 Mixed 37.6 SusWrite 40.5 53% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 13.9 4K Mixed 8.1 785% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 10.4 DQ Write 15.6 DQ Mixed 8.1 845% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB 4,599 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.4 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 31.3 108% 37.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 48.7 SC Mixed 30.8 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 54.9 73% 54.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $264Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	278x
Core i9-9900KIntel $399Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	249x
Core i7-8700KIntel $175Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	154x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	65x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	73x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $157Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $102Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $669

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16