Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory58.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateApr 23 '21 at 05:00
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95
1-Core 150
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 1,090
100% 837 Pts
64-Core 1,546
96% 1,546 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 161
Reflection 156
Parallax 156
131% 157 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 138
Splatting 120
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 484 503 505 506 506 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 2489
Write 2,115
Mixed 1,624
SusWrite 506
375% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 68.1
228% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1068
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 445
395% 616 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 232%
Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 475 475 475 475 474 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 438
Mixed 388
SusWrite 474
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 49.1
164% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 354
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
7GB free
Firmware: K3110310
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,234
Write 260
Mixed 426
138% 640 MB/s
4K Read 204
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 99.5
474% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,257
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 419
396% 647 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
907GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 474 475 474 474 474 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 440
Mixed 389
SusWrite 474
101% 448 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 75.3
4K Mixed 42.8
144% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 352
263% 350 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 200 203 202 203 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 166
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 202
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 110%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
672GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 53 53 54 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.5
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 31.3
108% 38 GB/s
SC Read 21.2
SC Write 49.9
SC Mixed 30.8
97% 34 GB/s
Latency 57.1
70% 57.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,004 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback