Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 14 '21 at 01:36
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 292
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,097
101% 847 Pts
64-Core 1,567
97% 1,567 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 103%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 152
Parallax 155
130% 156 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 137
Splatting 119
118% 149 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1038 875 858 859 858 854 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2551
Write 2,108
Mixed 1,598
SusWrite 890
399% 1,787 MB/s
4K Read 63.1
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 67.6
227% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,064
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 445
395% 614 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
465GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 478 476 477 477 475 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 463
Mixed 390
SusWrite 476
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 49.2
162% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 353
263% 349 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 134%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB
2GB free
Firmware: K3110310
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,239
Write 255
Mixed 429
138% 641 MB/s
4K Read 163
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 97.6
412% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,204
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 411
385% 625 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 328%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
907GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 478 475 477 477 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 476
Mixed 385
SusWrite 476
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 73.7
4K Mixed 42.4
143% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 353
263% 349 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 109%
Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 198 198 196 199 199 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 177
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 197
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166
696GB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 125 126 129 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 31.5
109% 38 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 48.2
SC Mixed 29.9
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 107%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback