Asus PRIME Z390-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 100% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 103% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME Z390-P (all builds)
Memory	20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '22 at 06:33
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$500 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 82.7 1-Core 136 2-Core 270 89% 163 Pts	4-Core 509 8-Core 947 87% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,435 89% 1,435 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$576 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 37A8) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 150 Parallax 165 126% 156 fps	MRender 166 Gravity 139 Splatting 116 112% 141 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS100T2G0A- 1TB 2,270 User benchmarks, average bench 115% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 59 3.2 2.9 1.7 9.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	22.3% Poor	Read 55.7 Write 100 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 18.8 44% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 8.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3 737% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 159%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 141 140 140 141 140 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	77.9% Very good	Read 131 Write 124 Mixed 59 SusWrite 140 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ DDR4 3000 DDR4 3000 2OZ 32GB 289 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2197, 2197, 2197, 2197 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	65.9% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 25.6 MC Mixed 20.9 66% 23.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 20.5 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME Z390-P Builds (Compare 15,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 113%

UFO

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-P - $119

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $290Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	4,618x
Core i5-9600KIntel $120Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	2,727x
Core i9-9900KIntel $500Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,362x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $378Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,775x
RTX 2060Nvidia $235Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	991x
RTX 2070Nvidia $450Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	922x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $48Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	637x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $54Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	578x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $45Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	458x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	582x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	368x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	364x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $875

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $310	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $137	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $397	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $60
Intel Core i5-12600K $215	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $260	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $54	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16