Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 11 '21 at 15:53
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 95.2 1-Core 152 2-Core 302 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 1,113 102% 854 Pts	64-Core 1,557 96% 1,557 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	122% Outstanding	Lighting 162 Reflection 155 Parallax 157 132% 158 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 138 Splatting 120 119% 150 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69 495,311 User benchmarks, average bench 275% 370GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 883 873 869 867 861 861 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	277% Outstanding	Read 2,486 Write 2,264 Mixed 1,368 SusWrite 869 390% 1,747 MB/s	4K Read 63.7 4K Write 130 4K Mixed 82.5 271% 92.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,145 DQ Write 631 DQ Mixed 877 655% 884 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 277% Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 465GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 484 484 484 482 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	121% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 469 Mixed 389 SusWrite 483 103% 458 MB/s	4K Read 41.2 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 54 181% 62.7 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 352 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 134%
Intel MEMPEK1W032GA 29GB 1,656 User benchmarks, average bench 263% 27GB free Firmware: K3110310 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 262 262 265 261 262 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	257% Outstanding	Read 1,210 Write 252 Mixed 417 SusWrite 263 117% 535 MB/s	4K Read 206 4K Write 97.1 4K Mixed 128 528% 144 MB/s	DQ Read 1,254 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 403 386% 637 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 257% Great: 328%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 907GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 482 481 484 484 484 481 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 457 Mixed 387 SusWrite 483 103% 459 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 93 4K Mixed 45.4 157% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 350 263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 200 201 202 203 203 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 202 Write 194 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 201 124% 170 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 114%
Seagate IronWolf 8TB (2016)-$166 904 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 673GB free Firmware: SC61 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 129 128 127 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 106%
M4-CT128 M4SSD2 128GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 119GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 40 40 40 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 37.8 Write 37.7 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 40.2 52% 38.2 MB/s	4K Read 10.2 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 8.3 820% 11.1 MB/s	DQ Read 10.5 DQ Write 15.7 DQ Mixed 8.1 848% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB 4,599 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 42.3 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 30.8 109% 38.1 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 48.6 SC Mixed 31.3 95% 33.4 GB/s	Latency 56.5 71% 56.5 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 1,005 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 106%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z390 Phantom Gaming-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	278x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	249x
Core i7-8700KIntel $188Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	155x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	65x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	61x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $99Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	74x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $142Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $103Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	74x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 117% - Outstanding

Total price: $671

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48