Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120321
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 05:40
Run Duration	337 Seconds
Run User	BRN-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 176 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 314 8-Core 333 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 347 22% 347 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.1% Poor	Lighting 36.7 Reflection 38.4 Parallax 38 30% 37.7 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 38.8 Splatting 27.4 28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 596GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 97 100 100 102 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 349 Write 282 Mixed 243 SusWrite 97.5 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 58.9 4K Mixed 33.9 113% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 34.7 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 48.9 44% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 358GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 43 38 43 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 54.6 Write 83.6 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 41.7 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 587GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 92 91 81 92 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 53.9 Write 107 Mixed 58.2 SusWrite 88.7 57% 76.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 104 102 104 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	61.2% Good	Read 112 Write 107 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 102 70% 94.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.2% Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 211GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 73 72 64 73 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	42.8% Average	Read 78.5 Write 127 Mixed 40.8 SusWrite 70 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.7 158% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Read 18.4 Write 33.2 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 25.6 42% 29.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 256GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.5 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 124 Write 120 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 0.8 84% 70.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 261GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.2 0.1 0 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 0.2 84% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 47%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 606GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 25 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	26% Poor	Read 99.8 Write 122 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 25.5 99% 76.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 504GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 48 48 49 49 49 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	36.2% Below average	Read 119 Write 113 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 48.2 109% 85.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 41%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00DC0B0 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 841GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 25 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 116 Write 109 Mixed 58.4 SusWrite 25.4 96% 77 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.9 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 41%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 129GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 48 48 48 48 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 94.1 Write 29.7 Mixed 39.9 SusWrite 47.7 63% 52.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 38%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 418GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 25 26 26 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 115 Write 114 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 25.8 100% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.8 122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 47%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 108 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 867GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 131 Write 108 Mixed 65.8 SusWrite 0.1 92% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 650GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 122 Write 40.9 Mixed 46.9 SusWrite 0.4 56% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 114% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 401GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	24.5% Poor	Read 123 Write 122 Mixed 50.1 SusWrite 0.1 90% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24.5% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 463GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 110 Write 113 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 0.1 79% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.4 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 10.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	33x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	25x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16