Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 (all builds)
Memory	15.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120321
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '20 at 10:24
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	BRN-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80.6 1-Core 93.7 2-Core 182 69% 119 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 354 48% 355 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.3% Poor	Lighting 37.2 Reflection 40.6 Parallax 38 30% 38.6 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 27.3 27% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 610GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 366 Write 308 Mixed 255 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 58.6 4K Mixed 31.7 108% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33.3 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 45.6 42% 63.2 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 2TB-$105 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 398GB free Firmware: 1AN10002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 93.7 Write 104 Mixed 31.7 56% 76.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 594GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 84.6 Write 107 Mixed 52.3 60% 81.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 169% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 72%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 117 Write 106 Mixed 73.1 73% 98.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119 45,158 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 211GB free Firmware: 1AQ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 71 66 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 105 Write 141 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 69.4 69% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 24GB 14,716 User benchmarks, average bench 43% null MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.6% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 8.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.3 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P67A-UD3R-B3 Builds (Compare 114 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD3R-B3

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $188Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	33x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	25x
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	8x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
830 256GBSamsung $261Bench 72%, 25,763 samples	6x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	38x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	18x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $308

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369